|
|
Radiography
|
|
|
We will broadly define radiography as imaging
by ionizing radiation. Some of this radiation is not actually photonic -
neutrons, for example - but we include it in our coverage because most means of
transforming images made by non-photonic radiation into electronic form involve photonic
intermediaries. All applications - medical, industrial, scientific - are
included. Most of the technology is similar and as imaging becomes more
universally digital, the distinctions continue to shrink.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Terminology
of Radiography |
|
|
Each of the major subdivisions of radiography
has adopted slightly different terminology for the same things. This is
not to say that these terms are always internally consistent or universally
accepted within each of the subdivisions, however. Thus, all the
definitions here must be taken with advice against instant acceptance.
|
|
|
|
Medical Imaging -
In medical x-ray imaging, "radiography" has conventionally meant
static x-rays taken on film. "Fluoroscopy" has meant dynamic
imaging, first by direct viewing of fluorescent screens in darkened rooms and
then by ever more sensitive and complex apparatus utilizing x-ray image
intensifiers. Early on there was some overlap when both multiple images
taken in rapid sequence on large sheets of radiographic film and similar rapid
image sequences taken through an image intensifier were both designated "spotfilms".
As digital image processing has increasingly taken over diagnostic imaging, the
use of the word "digital" has proliferated so that now "digital
radiographs" can be laser-scanned large film, high-resolution images from image
intensifiers, or direct digital images from CCD arrays or large-area panel
imagers. Since much of the newer direct digital equipment can take images
in rapid sequence - some even at fluoroscopic rates - the boundary gets grayer
and grayer.
|
|
Overall, the most common purposes of medical
imaging are the visualization of structures in the body for either
"diagnostic" or "interventional" procedures or for
verification after procedures like hip replacements. Few quantitative
measurements are made from x-ray images except for some geometric studies of,
for example, the head ("cephalometry") in preparation for orthodontia
or for bone densitometry. Expect, however, an increase in x-ray images
taken specifically to facilitate computer-assisted diagnosis. High-energy
verification images for radiation therapy (portal imaging) are becoming more
common: soon, the electronic versions of these images will provide dose
estimates as well.
|
|
|
|
Industrial Imaging -
Industrial radiographs were film and real-time industrial x-ray imaging was
"radioscopy". "Fluoroscopy" is becoming more common in
industry as the medical and industrial equipment and techniques increasingly
overlap. Most of the differences in technique result from the relatively
higher x-ray energies required to x-ray industrial objects and from the freedom
from restrictions on patient dose. The "intensifying screen"
used with film in diagnostic imaging is, for instance, a phosphor sheet while
the high-energy industrial counterpart is a lead foil. Imaging without
intensifying screens is also common in industry while nearly prohibited in
medical use. Special geometries are also common in industrial work.
"Laminography" is widely used in printed circuit board
inspection. The medical equivalent is "tomography" but there the
slicing is rarely performed in real time. Industrial inspection often
requires resolution beyond the capability of the x-ray tubes used in medicine so
"micro-focus" tubes with focal spots down to just a few microns are
utilized.
|
|
Industrial x-ray imaging falls in two
relatively separated application categories defined by who (or what) examines
the images. Currently, most of the examination is performed by highly
trained radiographers able to squeeze the last bit of contrast out of very dense
images. The objects of their inspection are new castings and welds and
pipe and all varieties of objects and structures that deteriorate with
time. In a few manufacturing settings - tire production or baggage
inspection, for example - real-time imaging is applied. But, even here,
human eyes usually do the analysis. More frequently, now, these real-time
imagers are connected to computers that perform automated image analysis and
make the go/no-go decisions without human help. This is "x-ray
machine vision".
|
|
|
|
Scientific Imaging -
Most scientific x-ray images are not of real objects. The two largest
applications are "autoradiography", in which a radioactive
distribution from (typically) an electrophoresis plate is placed in contact with
x-ray film or "diffractometry" in which a thin x-ray beam illuminates
a small crystal or powder and the diffracted beams are captured. Specimen
imaging using both film and electronic means is also common. "X-ray
microscopy" is available using micro-focus tubes. Another common
scientific x-ray technique, "x-ray fluorescence" uses no images at
all.
|
|
|
|
New Trends -
This is by no means the end. In both medical and industrial applications
there are now "reverse-geometry" systems in which the x-ray source is
a large plane and the detector is a point. Also in every filed, there is
growing interest in "cone-beam" computed topography in which the usual
x-ray apparatus is rotated about an object for very fast volume
acquisitions. Finally, "3-D imaging", in which the data from a
few plane images is manipulated digitally to provide a volume reconstruction is
under wide investigation.
|
|
| Radiation
Units |
|
| Radiation measurements must be taken and
manipulated very carefully because of the complex behavior of materials when
exposed. Quantum effects must be considered in any analysis, especially as
energies increase. Energy spectrum is especially important in assessing
biological effects. As a result, the units used in ionizing radiation
measurement are generally more complex that those used for light. The
problem is somewhat akin to the difference between radiometry, which is purely
physical, and photometry, which introduces biological considerations.
Unfortunately, due to number of strong interactions between matter and radiation
at higher energies, even the physical aspects are difficult. The seriously
interested are directed to one of the technical organizations
listed below. Other practitioners may find some use from the data
references alone. |
|
 |
National
Research Council Canada |
|
An illustrated
explanation of the relationship among exposure, air kerma and absorbed
dose are provided. A clear explanation for the need to develop and
implement the KERMA concept is presented. Other related issues are
discussed on nearby pages. |
 |
Karolinska
Institute |
|
A brief biography of Rolf
Sievert (formerly head of the Department of Medical Radiation Physics
at Karolinska) and a discussion of the unit now identified by his name.
In frames, so you have to click the Rolf Sievert link. |
|
|
|
|
| Calculations |
|
| Emission - All
x-ray sources are woefully inefficient - 2% is about the maximum - so the
history of x-ray sources is the history of heat tolerance and transfer.
Since x-ray sources have always depended on just two physical phenomena, there
also hasn't been much change in the available spectra since Röntgen's
time. Does anyone think this will change? |
|
|
| Absorption - Absorption
of x-rays by materials increases with atomic number because at lower energies
the interactions are primarily with the electron cloud via Compton
scattering. In essence, x-ray images are electron density images.
Absorption drops rapidly with increasing energy until the photoelectric effect
dominates and then begins to rise again as pair production begins.
References are given here to graphs and tables of x-ray attenuation but be very
careful in using them because some are normalized to mass and some aren't.
The tutorials may help. |
 |
Lawrence
Berkeley Laboratory |
|
X-ray
transmission of thin elements and compounds can be calculated using
this page and reported as a curve or a data set. Both log and linear
plots are supported but the energy range is only 10eV to 30keV. A
similar calculator provides the x-ray attenuation
length (distance for intensity to fall to 1/e). |
 |
National
Institute of Standards and Technology |
|
A comprehensive introduction
to X-ray mass attenuation coefficients is available from NIST. From
this page, tables of the mass attenuation coefficients for the elements
and for some common compounds
and other substances can be accessed. The energy range covered is
1keV to 20MeV. |
|
|
|
|
| History |
|
| The practical history of radiography is the
history of the hardware. It has always been the case that clinicians
wanting to perform procedures beyond the capabilities of the equipment inspired
the engineers to push the technology just a little farther. The conversion
to digital has changed radiology in fundamental ways but materials science, in
radiology as in all technological disciplines, has most often controlled the
pace of change. |
| |
| General History - The
centenary of the discovery of x-rays led many organizations to dig out
the historical information and publish some of it. Fortunately, some
of it is accessible through the internet. There is really no substitute,
however, for seeing this old equipment. |
|
|
| |
| Company Histories - These are histories presented by companies that
include both general and proprietary milestones. They often present
interesting pictures of the company founders and the original equipment they
made. |
 |
General
Electric |
|
Not much on GE specifically
but a nice brief history of mammography
(at CGR, then GE) with illustrations. |
 |
Philips |
|
Philips Medical Systems
presents its history
and a timeline
with many interesting first-time claims. The Philips clinical journal Medica
Mundi often has articles on the
history of x-rays, including the Philips contribution. These are in PDF
format. |
 |
Picker
X-Ray |
|
For a while, Picker was
Marconi Medical Systems and is now part of Philips. Some of the
Picker historical material is still online. "A
Legacy of Caring" is the history of Picker written in 1995 by
long-time Picker engineer Tony Palermo. It describes all of the
important people and key events. The online version is gone but you
can still download a PDF
version from the Marconi archives for the GEC Review. |
 |
Rigaku |
|
"Rigaku
is X-ray Technology" A timeline 1920-present with
pictures. |
 |
Shimadzu |
|
A fairly detailed timeline
with explanatory text from the maker of the first x-ray systems in Japan. |
 |
Siemens |
|
Siemens has a complete history
- "125
Years of Siemens Medical Solutions", downloadable as a PDF.
Siemens got into the x-ray business by buying Reiniger, Gebbert & Schall AG in 1925. The German Historical
Museum, Berlin, has pictures of some of their early
equipment. |
 |
Toshiba |
|
The corporate website has a timeline
but only one x-ray mention - that Toshiba made the first x-ray tube in
Japan. There is actually a timeline,
but only in Japanese. |
|
|
|
|
| If you have any historical documents we can
reference by link or put on our site, please let us know. |
|
| Booklist |
|
 |
Naked to the Bone : Medical Imaging
in the Twentieth Century |
|
| Bettyann
Holtzmann Kevles |

|
Hardcover
(December 1996) (Sloan Technology Series)
Rutgers University Press |
|
Also available in
paperback: 378 pages (April 1998)
Perseus Press

|
| Starting with
Roentgen's investigation of the glow emitted by a cathode-ray
tube, this book follows the development of diagnostic imaging
through the 20th century. It includes a great deal of historical
information about the medical community's attitude towards
radiation and cover a great deal of social history, showing the
effects of the X-ray on art, fashion, and self-image. There
are a few technical errors. |
|
|
 |
Something About X-rays for
Everybody |
|
| Edward
Trevert |

|
Hardcover
(November 1988)
Medical Physics Pub Corp |
|
| This is a
reproduction of a book written in 1896 containing reprints of "The
X-ray Century" including Röntgen's original papers and various other
contemporary x-ray articles. |
|
|
 |
Principles
of Radiographic Imaging: An Art and a Science |
|
| Arlene McKenna Adler,
Richard R. Carlton |

|
Hardcover
(September 2000)
Delmar Publishers |
|
There is also a
companion lab manual and workbook.

|
| This book presents a
comprehensive introduction to radiographic imaging, covering the
physics of the entire generation - attenuation - sensing process and providing
sample problems with answers. |
|
|
|
|
|